Skip to content

Settings and activity

3 results found

  1. 22 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Dan supported this idea  · 
  2. 71 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Dan supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dan commented  · 

    Agreed.

    I always want a relevant description in all changes and it is laborious and cumbersome to remember or go and find, copy, and paste the descriptions of all relevant changes being brought in with the merge. This becomes more laborious with a workflow that encourages frequent branching and merging.

    I think we might really only be wanting automatically adding change descriptions of all changes done in the source branch since the last merge of the source branch into the target branch. Maybe we'd want to exclude descriptions of merge changes done in the source branch but that's trivial to just manually delete from the automatic cumulative description.

  3. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Dan supported this idea  ·