JakubH

My feedback

  1. 20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    JakubH commented  · 

    Customizable column with attributes would be even better. That would allow to see which branches/changesets/... from a list have an attribute set and which haven't, without a need to go through all of them and waiting for a tooltip to appear (or inspecting an Attributes tab).

    JakubH supported this idea  · 
  2. 153 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    20 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    JakubH commented  · 

    I have found another case where this would be needed – for an "Item loaded twice conflict" after cherry-pick with an added item: http://www.plasticscm.net/index.php?/topic/2118-item-loaded-twice-conflict/

    JakubH supported this idea  · 
    JakubH commented  · 

    I should mention that it means: allow resolve an evil twin conflict with merge.

    JakubH shared this idea  · 
  3. 84 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    JakubH commented  · 

    This can be almost accomplished with triggers and attributes already. Not the status icons but at least the branch colors (conditional format) can be used.

  4. 43 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    JakubH commented  · 

    As far as I know, the Plastic 5.0.44 has added the merges to a History as a 2D tree view, but it doesn't add it to History view and it doesn't take into account the reverts (Revert to this revision) in both views.

    JakubH commented  · 

    http://www.plasticscm.net/index.php?/topic/1291-some-ux-issues/?p=12646
    History and History as 2D tree are very useful features. However, there is a problem with those views. They do not show the real history of changes of the item as user may expect. The history view is actually a list of all revisions of that file, which is not the same, because the same revision could be used more than once and in more places. I mean, when using Revert to this revision, an old revision is checked-in again, but this information is not shown in the “History” because no new revision has been made. Similarly, when there was a merge (or a cherry pick) between branches, a file change was copied to another branch, but you don’t see this important thing in “History”. Again: because no new revision of that file has been made. History as 2D tree has both of these limits too. This leads to a big confusion among users – see these links for instance:

    http://www.plasticscm.net/index.php?/topic/1741-merge-not-displayed-neither-in-file-history-nor-in-file-2d-history/
    http://plasticscm.uservoice.com/forums/15467-general/suggestions/3950398-show-merges-in-file-history-and-2d-history (This suggestion is basically a subset of mine.)
    http://www.plasticscm.net/index.php?/topic/1860-missing-file-history-entry-after-revert/
    http://www.plasticscm.net/index.php?/topic/1939-file-revisions-and-tracking-them/

    So my suggestion is add all these information to History views two. Frankly, I don’t see any usecase where somebody doesn’t want to see it.

    JakubH shared this idea  · 
  5. 27 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    JakubH shared this idea  · 
  6. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    JakubH commented  · 

    I believe it has been fixed already.

  7. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    JakubH supported this idea  · 
    JakubH commented  · 

    See also this: http://plasticscm.uservoice.com/forums/15467-general/suggestions/2675742-vs2010-plugin-add-ability-to-click-on-item-in-pen
    Because the modality of the Pending Changes window makes some views opened from the context menu inaccessible.

  8. 68 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    JakubH commented  · 

    Unfortunately, we use Visual C++ (or C++/CLI rarely). However, method history for C++ would be great. ;-)

    Yeah, history of a selected line would be great too. It basically leads to my other (more general) suggestion here: http://plasticscm.uservoice.com/forums/15467-general/suggestions/2938098-interactive-file-history-annotation-

    JakubH commented  · 

    What is maybe more important here is the idea of launching Annotate from a Merge tool (and scrolling to the same line automatically). That is something what I need quite often when I am trying to resolve a conflict.
    More on this here: http://www.plasticscm.net/index.php?/topic/1291-some-ux-issues/#entry8989

    JakubH supported this idea  · 
    JakubH shared this idea  · 
  9. 24 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    JakubH supported this idea  · 
    JakubH commented  · 

    There are also no context menus in this modal Pending changes dialog. The same problem is in an Windows Explorer extension too.
    http://www.plasticscm.net/index.php?/topic/1291-some-ux-issues/#entry10137

  10. 91 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    JakubH supported this idea  · 
  11. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    JakubH supported this idea  · 
    JakubH shared this idea  · 
  12. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    JakubH supported this idea  · 
    JakubH shared this idea  · 
2 Next →

Feedback and Knowledge Base