Skip to content

Settings and activity

12 results found

  1. 62 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wolfram commented  · 

    Why is this entry still listed as active? it has been implemented already, see https://blog.plasticscm.com/2018/11/unified-diff-of-branch.html and "cm patch".

  2. 14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Wolfram supported this idea  · 
  3. 87 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wolfram commented  · 

    An alternative feature that would solve the same problem (and might also be helpful elswehere) is to be able to extract the changes of a changeset to a shelf.
    So before deleting a changeset, you could create a shelf for all its changes. Then delete the changeset (which resets you to its parent, if it was your home), and then simply apply the shelf.

  4. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wolfram commented  · 

    Note that you would not have to do an exhaustive search for all changed items, as with the Pending Changes view.
    The dashed home is just a marker telling you "yes, something is locally going on", so it's not relevant WHAT has been changed. Therefore you could break off the search for locally changed items as soon as you find any one, speeding up the Branch Explorer refresh.

    Wolfram shared this idea  · 
  5. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wolfram commented  · 

    @Codice Software: As you already included the (optional) auto-refresh for the Pending Changes view, there is now an inconsistency, where the Pending Changes automatically refresh, but the Branch Explorer does not. This is very confusing and leads to mistakes.

    Wolfram supported this idea  · 
  6. 15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Wolfram supported this idea  · 
  7. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Wolfram supported this idea  · 
  8. 40 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Wolfram shared this idea  · 
  9. 25 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wolfram commented  · 

    Yep, they are only marginally useful if they are gone the next time you open the client.
    But they would become REALLY useful if you can continue the next day where you left off.
    NOTE this is not about labels - bookmarks are great for temprarily (and locally!) tagging certain changesets in individual workspaces, while labels are global.

    Wolfram supported this idea  · 
  10. 46 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wolfram commented  · 

    We like to use labels for a lot of things ("ready for integration", "merged but task still open", "needs upstream cherrypick", "is internal baseline", "is customer release", ...). But without label colors these disctinctions are of little use in the branch explorer, as you'd have to click on each label (or try to read the lightgrey-on-white labeltext which is cut of after like 10 characters).

    Marking labels with prefixes is therefore also not an option/solution, due to the length limit and light grey color.

    Wolfram supported this idea  · 
  11. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Wolfram supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wolfram commented  · 

    He means the branch explorer, yes.
    He means the label text itself, which is an unreadable light-grey-on-white.
    What is also an idea is to adjust the color of the actual label, see here: https://plasticscm.uservoice.com/forums/15467-general/suggestions/3584266-allow-setting-a-color-for-each-label-changeset-an

  12. 60 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Wolfram commented  · 

    As others mentioned, it is already implemented in the 2D history view, so just enable it for the regular Branch Explorer as well. And make it a Display Option, for people who don't want them.

    Re: "Problem is with big cset numbers": in the 2D history view it works fine, with enough room for at least 5digit numbers

    Wolfram supported this idea  ·