Settings and activity

  1. 24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    robl commented  · 

    Sadly none of the recent improvements apply to gtkplastic.

    robl shared this idea  · 
  2. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    robl commented  · 

    4) an option to filter the history list to only show ancestors of the current revision
    5) option to only draw the the revision changesets on the item version tree (ie. an ancestor graph)

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    robl commented  · 

    Hi, yes I understand there is a difference between changesets and revisions but am not clear why all the 'U' changesets are necessary.

    eg. if a file only contains 4 revisions, why are there many more 'U' changesets (>100) than visible branches (~20)? Even with 'display only relevant changesets', there are many U's with connected only to changesets on the same branch. The 4 revisions appear in 'A' and 'C' changesets. There are also 'A(Me)' changesets. These labels aren't described in the legend.

    What I would really like to see is a minimal diagram clearly highlighting the actual revisions with very little else. Not sure how possible this is though. Otherwise some functionality to search for all the actual revision changesets would help.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    robl commented  · 

    The version tree contains many hundreds more changesets than the history list with many of them marked 'U'. Even displaying only relevant changesets and filtering out other people's branches the diagram is very noisy and difficult to use.

    robl shared this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    robl commented  · 

    re the change-lists: I'm not sure what is possible with these - the option is disabled and I can't try them. I suspect they won't help with the above though?

    Yes, your example is exactly what I would like to do. cset 1 would contain temporary edits that should stay on the branch. 3 & 4 would contain edits (possibly to the same files as in 1) that I would like merged.

    It is awkward to retain temporary edits in a workspace, particularly if you need to make some 'real' edits to the same files.

    robl shared this idea  · 
  4. 116 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    robl commented  · 

    I would like to be able to add a column for parent changeset and the changeset number in a different xlinked repo. Modified file count, or SLOC (as in "Analyze differences") could be useful too. Perhaps add a button to populate the slow columns on demand?

    robl supported this idea  · 
  5. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    robl shared this idea  · 
  6. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    robl shared this idea  · 
  7. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    robl commented  · 

    The same should apply when pressing the 'home' working changeset button.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    robl commented  · 

    other possible reasons:
    4) filtered by the date filter
    5) filtered by new inclusion/exclusion rules

    robl shared this idea  · 
  8. 5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    robl shared this idea  · 
  9. 32 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    robl shared this idea  · 
  10. 24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    robl commented  · 

    Another way to facilitate 2) would be to allow "Diff selected changesets" between the checkout changeset and any other in branch explorer. Currently there are no context menus when this changeset and another is selected.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    robl commented  · 

    Alternatively the "Merge from" view could be left populated after the merge rather than clearing it (just disable the "process" button, but possibly add an "undo" one), and the column and compare menus added there.

    robl shared this idea  · 
  11. 5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    robl shared this idea  · 
  12. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    robl shared this idea  · 
  13. 68 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    robl supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    robl commented  · 

    Perhaps list the history of a particular line with cs#? Sometimes it is not the most recent change you are looking for.

  14. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    robl shared this idea  · 
  15. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    robl commented  · 

    Also if a branch has no changesets it is not easy to find the base. A 'goto base' context menu for the branch would be useful. It should also take account of rebases and either list all bases in order or just the latest one.

    robl shared this idea  · 
  16. 19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    robl shared this idea  · 
  17. 129 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    robl commented  · 

    Yes, it is quite an effort to stay up-to-date.

    Will also need a proxy configuration on Linux (eg. RSS Notifications can't get past our firewall).

    For large teams, perhaps the admin could update a flag on the plastic server to let everyone update (maybe even cache the new versions on the server)?

    robl supported this idea  · 
  18. 59 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    robl commented  · 
  19. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    robl commented  · 

    This is related to the following idea:
    https://plasticscm.uservoice.com/forums/15467-general/suggestions/2579737-unix-diff-output-for-file-differences

    ie. implementing --tool would let you specify the unix 'diff' program to achieve this.

    robl shared this idea  ·