126 results found

1. Software Testing Basics Focused on Test Planning and Strategy

   Software testing basics are not limited to execution—they begin with thoughtful planning and strategy. A clear testing plan sets direction, defines scope, allocates resources, and establishes measurable objectives. Without proper planning, even well-written test cases may fail to deliver meaningful quality outcomes.

   One of the first steps in applying software testing basics effectively is defining the testing scope. Teams must determine which features will be validated, which environments will be used, and what success criteria must be met before release. Clear scope prevents over-testing low-impact areas and under-testing critical workflows.

   A structured testing strategy also outlines timelines, responsibilities, risk areas, and entry/exit criteria. These fundamentals ensure alignment between development and QA teams, reducing confusion during execution. When expectations are documented early, testing becomes more predictable and organized.

   Risk assessment is another key component of software testing basics at the planning stage. Identifying high-impact modules, integration points, and historically unstable areas allows teams to prioritize efforts wisely. This risk-based allocation strengthens overall release confidence.

   Effective communication is equally important. Regular status updates, defined reporting formats, and measurable milestones keep stakeholders informed about testing progress and quality health. Transparency builds trust and supports better decision-making.

   By emphasizing planning and strategy as part of software testing basics, teams move from reactive defect detection to proactive quality control. Strong preparation creates smoother execution, reduced last-minute surprises, and more stable product releases.

   Learn more about the fundamentals of software testing:
   https://keploy.io/blog/community/software-testing-basics

   Software testing basics are not limited to execution—they begin with thoughtful planning and strategy. A clear testing plan sets direction, defines scope, allocates resources, and establishes measurable objectives. Without proper planning, even well-written test cases may fail to deliver meaningful quality outcomes.

   One of the first steps in applying software testing basics effectively is defining the testing scope. Teams must determine which features will be validated, which environments will be used, and what success criteria must be met before release. Clear scope prevents over-testing low-impact areas and under-testing critical workflows.

   A structured testing strategy also outlines timelines, responsibilities, risk areas,… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Black Box Testing: Evaluating Software from the User’s Perspective

   Black box testing focuses on validating software functionality without examining the internal code or system architecture. Testers interact with the application just like end users—providing inputs and verifying outputs based on requirements and expected behavior. This approach ensures that the system delivers the right results, regardless of how it is implemented internally.

   By concentrating on user flows, business logic, and interface behavior, black box testing helps identify missing features, incorrect calculations, integration issues, and unexpected responses. It is especially valuable during system testing and acceptance testing, where the primary goal is to confirm that the software meets functional specifications.

   In modern development environments, black box testing supports automation strategies, API validation, and UI testing efforts. Because it is requirement-driven rather than code-driven, it also encourages clearer documentation and better collaboration between developers, testers, and stakeholders.

   Ultimately, black box testing strengthens product reliability by ensuring that what users see and experience aligns with what the system is intended to deliver.

   Learn more about black box testing here:
   https://keploy.io/docs/concepts/reference/glossary/black-box-testing/

   Black box testing focuses on validating software functionality without examining the internal code or system architecture. Testers interact with the application just like end users—providing inputs and verifying outputs based on requirements and expected behavior. This approach ensures that the system delivers the right results, regardless of how it is implemented internally.

   By concentrating on user flows, business logic, and interface behavior, black box testing helps identify missing features, incorrect calculations, integration issues, and unexpected responses. It is especially valuable during system testing and acceptance testing, where the primary goal is to confirm that the software meets functional specifications.

   In… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Why Regression Testing Is Critical for Continuous Product Evolution?

   Regression testing ensures that new features, bug fixes, or system changes do not unintentionally break existing functionality. As software evolves through frequent updates and rapid releases, maintaining stability becomes increasingly challenging—and regression testing acts as a safeguard against unexpected failures.

   In agile and DevOps environments, regression testing is often automated and integrated into CI/CD pipelines. Each code commit can trigger test suites that validate previously working workflows. This continuous validation helps teams detect defects early, reduce production risks, and maintain user trust.

   Beyond just defect detection, regression testing also supports long-term product health. It provides historical confidence, documents expected system behavior, and helps measure application stability across versions. When paired with strong test coverage and clear acceptance criteria, it becomes a strategic tool for sustainable development.

   Without regression testing, software teams risk introducing recurring bugs, degraded performance, and inconsistent user experiences. With it, they gain controlled growth—where innovation and stability move forward together.

   Learn more about regression testing here-
   https://keploy.io/blog/community/regression-testing-an-introductory-guide

   Regression testing ensures that new features, bug fixes, or system changes do not unintentionally break existing functionality. As software evolves through frequent updates and rapid releases, maintaining stability becomes increasingly challenging—and regression testing acts as a safeguard against unexpected failures.

   In agile and DevOps environments, regression testing is often automated and integrated into CI/CD pipelines. Each code commit can trigger test suites that validate previously working workflows. This continuous validation helps teams detect defects early, reduce production risks, and maintain user trust.

   Beyond just defect detection, regression testing also supports long-term product health. It provides historical confidence, documents expected system… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Exploring Niche Benefits of Open Source Testing Tools for Specialized Applications

   While most discussions around open source testing tools focus on general-purpose testing, these tools can offer unique advantages for specialized applications—such as IoT systems, embedded software, or domain-specific platforms. Their flexibility allows engineers to create tailored testing workflows, simulate uncommon scenarios, or integrate with specialized hardware and protocols without being constrained by proprietary solutions.

   Additionally, open source tools foster experimentation. Teams can modify source code, build custom plugins, or combine multiple tools to address niche testing challenges. The active community often shares innovative solutions to uncommon problems, giving teams access to insights they might not develop in-house.

   For projects requiring adaptability and deep customization, open source testing tools not only reduce costs but also provide a sandbox for innovation, enabling teams to maintain quality even in highly specialized and rapidly evolving domains.

   Learn more about the top open source testing tools:
   https://keploy.io/blog/community/top-10-futuristic-open-source-testing-tools

   While most discussions around open source testing tools focus on general-purpose testing, these tools can offer unique advantages for specialized applications—such as IoT systems, embedded software, or domain-specific platforms. Their flexibility allows engineers to create tailored testing workflows, simulate uncommon scenarios, or integrate with specialized hardware and protocols without being constrained by proprietary solutions.

   Additionally, open source tools foster experimentation. Teams can modify source code, build custom plugins, or combine multiple tools to address niche testing challenges. The active community often shares innovative solutions to uncommon problems, giving teams access to insights they might not develop in-house.

   For projects requiring… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. How Code Coverage Drives Smarter Testing Strategies?

   Code coverage is often seen as a simple metric, but its true value lies in guiding smarter testing strategies. Beyond measuring how much of your code is executed during tests, it highlights critical areas that require attention and ensures that important logic paths are not overlooked.

   High coverage alone doesn’t guarantee quality—what matters is meaningful coverage. By analyzing which modules, conditions, or decision paths remain untested, teams can prioritize test creation and focus on high-risk areas. Combining code coverage with automated test generation and continuous monitoring helps maintain confidence even as the codebase evolves.

   Modern platforms, including Keploy, leverage code coverage insights to automatically suggest test cases and track gaps, enabling developers to maintain robust, reliable software while accelerating delivery cycles.

   Learn more about code coverage here:
   https://keploy.io/blog/community/understanding-code-coverage-in-software-testing

   Code coverage is often seen as a simple metric, but its true value lies in guiding smarter testing strategies. Beyond measuring how much of your code is executed during tests, it highlights critical areas that require attention and ensures that important logic paths are not overlooked.

   High coverage alone doesn’t guarantee quality—what matters is meaningful coverage. By analyzing which modules, conditions, or decision paths remain untested, teams can prioritize test creation and focus on high-risk areas. Combining code coverage with automated test generation and continuous monitoring helps maintain confidence even as the codebase evolves.

   Modern platforms, including Keploy, leverage code… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Hidden Advantages of Open Source Testing Tools

   When people talk about open source testing tools, the conversation often revolves around cost savings. While avoiding hefty licensing fees is certainly valuable, there are deeper, often overlooked benefits that make these tools essential in modern software development.

   One such advantage is transparency. With open source tools, teams can inspect the code, ensuring there are no black-box components that could affect reliability or security. This is especially important in regulated industries where compliance demands traceability.

   Another benefit lies in community-driven innovation. Since anyone can contribute, these tools evolve rapidly, with bugs patched faster and new features introduced in response to real-world challenges. This means organizations get access to cutting-edge testing practices long before they’re available in proprietary tools.

   Open source testing tools also promote skill development. Developers and testers learn directly from the tool’s inner workings, gaining deeper knowledge about testing frameworks, automation, and integration pipelines. Over time, this helps teams build stronger in-house expertise rather than depending solely on vendors.

   As the software ecosystem becomes more complex—with APIs, distributed systems, and containerized deployments—open source testing tools are proving their worth by being adaptable, transparent, and community-driven. They don’t just lower costs; they fundamentally change how teams approach testing and quality assurance.

   For more information about open source testing tools:
   https://keploy.io/blog/community/top-10-futuristic-open-source-testing-tools

   When people talk about open source testing tools, the conversation often revolves around cost savings. While avoiding hefty licensing fees is certainly valuable, there are deeper, often overlooked benefits that make these tools essential in modern software development.

   One such advantage is transparency. With open source tools, teams can inspect the code, ensuring there are no black-box components that could affect reliability or security. This is especially important in regulated industries where compliance demands traceability.

   Another benefit lies in community-driven innovation. Since anyone can contribute, these tools evolve rapidly, with bugs patched faster and new features introduced in response to… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Add function for server triggers to result in verbose message to user on failure.

   Server side triggers currently return 0 for pass, and non-zero for failures. It would be nice to be able to define a table of custom triggerReturnCodes on the server that is retrieved by the client. When a client performs an action that results in a server-side trigger failure the non-zero return code can be used to lookup the error code and provide the user with a more robust message describing the failure.

   For example, this robust message could mention pattern restrictions, size requirements, or direct the user to review compliance documents or retrieve crucial developer environment assets/scripts.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. ability to comment git on pull requests

   it would be awesome if I could add comments on github and bitbucket pull requests right in semanticdiff. it is already possible to fetch pull requests and add comments e.g. with SmartGit, which supports various git backends. Perhaps it would be possible to use their API (if there is one, that is) to add this feature with relatively low cost

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Add more keyboard shortcuts for previous / next diff

   Most compare tools support F7 / F8 to navigate through diffs (P4Merge, Araxis)

   You should consider adding at least F7 / F8 rather adding complex keyboard configuration in the tool.

   Araxis also support by default:
   - Ctrl + Page Up, Alt + Left
   - Ctrl + Page Down, Alt + Right

   7 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Disable Oops! We do not support your language... yet!

    Would be nice to have the option to disable the dialog as it keeps coming up with known unsupported languages.

    E.G. csproj file in VS (just run the text diff)

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Kotlin, please!

    Many Android developers are now switching from Java to Kotlin. It could be pretty well to have Kotlin support in SemanticMerge.

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Support for blank comparison

    Would be nice if you could start a blank comparison and then copy and paste code from different sources without saving to file like Meld.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. .Net, C#: Make #region/#endregion sections their own entity, rather than treating them as comments

    Currently, the #region and #endregion tags are treated as part of the comments for the method that occurs after them. As such, if you organize your code with these #region sections, and then you happen to move a method just below a #region to a different place, and then you have a merge conflict over that method, then the regions get messed up.

    13 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. semantic merge for better delta code review

    how awesome would it be if you join forces with another tool vendor and create a full integration of your semantic diff (including moving things from one file to another) and a tool that helps during code reviews and tracks findings...
    finally one could focus on real changes

    ps: plastic scm is missing on their list of integrations
    https://smartbear.com/product/collaborator/overview/

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. JetBrains IDE Support (Intellij IDEA, Rider, CLion, WebStorm, AppCode)

    I would love to use this with my favorite IDE!

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Allow me to reset machine license keys and create additional keys

    You've stated in a previousl request that you will allow us to request as many additial keys as we need since many of us have mutiple machines. Tha is an OK work around for now, but the request process is too cumbersone. ON top of that, if we reinstall Windows or get a new machine, which my team does often, then we need to request a reset of that key via email. This process needs dramatic improvement. At the very least, we need the ability to reset our own keys via the web interface and as added functionality, just allow us to create up to 3 per license...which should cover the multi-device issue for now.

    You've stated in a previousl request that you will allow us to request as many additial keys as we need since many of us have mutiple machines. Tha is an OK work around for now, but the request process is too cumbersone. ON top of that, if we reinstall Windows or get a new machine, which my team does often, then we need to request a reset of that key via email. This process needs dramatic improvement. At the very least, we need the ability to reset our own keys via the web interface and as added functionality, just allow… more

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. unified diff

    Be able to view unified diff-files directly

    you should be able to directly take a look at unified diffs.
    if you run the command "git diff <commit>...<commit> >> changes.diff" you should be able to directly open that .diff-file. this would be really convenient.

    tortoiseSVN merge/diff for example is capeable of doing that.

    11 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Git merge driver

    Why not implementing Git merge drivers for real git integration?

    19 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Show blank lines to align text

    When blocks differ in number of lines, they aren't correctly aligned in the panels. Where new lines were added/removed, blank lines should be displayed (like BeyondCompare does) which helps comparing line-by-line.

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Windows explorer context menu

    Most file diff applications have items in the windows explorer context menu to make it easier to launch the tool. It would be nice if semantic merge had something similar.

    17 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating