Skip to content

semanticmerge

semanticmerge

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

120 results found

  1. Server side triggers currently return 0 for pass, and non-zero for failures. It would be nice to be able to define a table of custom triggerReturnCodes on the server that is retrieved by the client. When a client performs an action that results in a server-side trigger failure the non-zero return code can be used to lookup the error code and provide the user with a more robust message describing the failure.

    For example, this robust message could mention pattern restrictions, size requirements, or direct the user to review compliance documents or retrieve crucial developer environment assets/scripts.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. it would be awesome if I could add comments on github and bitbucket pull requests right in semanticdiff. it is already possible to fetch pull requests and add comments e.g. with SmartGit, which supports various git backends. Perhaps it would be possible to use their API (if there is one, that is) to add this feature with relatively low cost

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Integrate with bitbucket. Will help tremendously with refactored code in pull requests. A web based gui will do the trick I believe

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. When comparing files with lots of changes, it would be helpful if the Visual Diff view is more interactive.

    For example when you hover an arrow of some moved code (and there are lots of arrows shown), it would be helpful if that arrow gets highlighted, to easily follow the arrow to spot its target.

    It would also be helpful if you can show and hide the different items (added, changed, removed, renamed items) that you are either interested in or not interested in (as that removes some complexity from the diff).

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Sometimes it would be nice to have the possibility to export the complete content of the visual diff window as an image.

    The idea behind is to have the complete image (without the need for scrolling) to be able to either print, attach or present it somewhere, or e.g. send it by e-mail.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Supporting distros is a pain as your repos are very outdated. Just release as a snap or flatpak and have it available everywhere.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. It would be really great to have support for the latest minor version of C# in time as a reaction to the fast paced language development.

    Otherweise commonly used features lead to annoying parsing errors e.g. the default literal expressions in C# 7.1.

    15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Most compare tools support F7 / F8 to navigate through diffs (P4Merge, Araxis)

    You should consider adding at least F7 / F8 rather adding complex keyboard configuration in the tool.

    Araxis also support by default:
    - Ctrl + Page Up, Alt + Left
    - Ctrl + Page Down, Alt + Right

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Would be nice to have the option to disable the dialog as it keeps coming up with known unsupported languages.

    E.G. csproj file in VS (just run the text diff)

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Sometimes, the diff panels on each file in semanticdiff are too narrow, even when hiding the Semantic Outline. Allowing horizontal scrolling with Shift + Mouse wheel would help reviewing long lines of code. A word wrap option would also do the job, although having both would be the best.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Would be nice if you could start a blank comparison and then copy and paste code from different sources without saving to file like Meld.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Many Android developers are now switching from Java to Kotlin. It could be pretty well to have Kotlin support in SemanticMerge.

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Semantic Merge allows for external parsers but currently it only allows for one, making the adoption of using them very limited, when you are using more than one non-supported language. I would like it if Semantic Merge could support configuring external parsers by extensions they handle.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Rust is a young but promising language. Having semantic merge would be awesome.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. how awesome would it be if you join forces with another tool vendor and create a full integration of your semantic diff (including moving things from one file to another) and a tool that helps during code reviews and tracks findings...
    finally one could focus on real changes

    ps: plastic scm is missing on their list of integrations
    https://smartbear.com/product/collaborator/overview/

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Currently, during a 3-way merge, the individual differences are marked only on the Remote, Base and Local files.

    On the Result file, it is only shown the main change (line deleted or added), the individual changes are not shown. For example, if you rename a word in one line, on the 3 source files you have that work highlighted, however, on the result file, it's not highlighted, which makes it hard to see what the difference was.

    This would be very useful when solving merge conflicts, because then we could see the differences clearly with the changes on top of…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Currently, during a 3-way merge, the shown differences are always between Remote/Base and Local/Base.

    It would be great to have the possibility of also showing the differences between Remote/Local.

    Why? Sometimes the Remote and Local files are exactly the same and since the differences are marked on them when compared to Base they seem to be very different to each other. We have then to open or copy/paste both Remote and Local files on a file editor and then compare them, to see that they are exactly the same.

    This is quite common, because when we use squash in Git…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Beyond Compare has a feature that I love: you can tell it which string (typically a variable name) on the left side correspond to which string on the right side. For example, you could tell that a variable "dollar" was renamed to "currency" and SM would change all instances automatically.
    Even better if, when a rename is detected, you can "approve" all renames in that particular scope.

    8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Show how smart you are by support Perl. It is said that only Perl can understand Perl...

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3 4 5 6
  • Don't see your idea?