semanticmerge

semanticmerge

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  1. When a conflict is resolved, it still uses a red color in the scroll bar, meaning there's no easy way to check which ones are solved and which aren't.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. please run a simple diff with semanticmerge
    It will tell you that the include <...> has been changed, not the comment

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. how awesome would it be if you join forces with another tool vendor and create a full integration of your semantic diff (including moving things from one file to another) and a tool that helps during code reviews and tracks findings...
    finally one could focus on real changes

    ps: plastic scm is missing on their list of integrations
    https://smartbear.com/product/collaborator/overview/

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Would be nice if you could start a blank comparison and then copy and paste code from different sources without saving to file like Meld.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Basically, when running the diff tool outside of the IDE if you want to compare another set of diffs, you'll nee to close the semantic merge tool and reopen it.

    Would be great if we could be presented with the "welcome dialog" you see when you open the app for the first time.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. I usually install my programming tools into a bin directory in my dropbox profile, so that it's replicated across my machines. This is a problem with SM, which tells me my license is corrupt any time I switch boxes.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Free pascal support please ;-)

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. The packages here don't work on Fedora 20:

    http://www.semanticmerge.com/linux/#fedora

    I looks like you just need to recompile against a newer version of libtiff.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Add support for Visual Basic/VBA

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. If the selected changeset removed something and added something else, the result file panel will show the old line with a strikethrough. That's a bit counter-intuitive, IMO, for I want to see the actual result (which wouldn't include any removed lines).

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Currently (for some time now) when running 'update' in aptitude the following error is reported:

    A: GPG error: https://www.semanticmerge.com ./ Release: The following signatures are not valid: KEYEXPIRED 1442157655

    Of course, this has nothing to do with 'aptitude'.

    A new key needs to be provided and packages need to be signed with that key.

    The way Debian and Ubuntu do this is to have a separate package which is signed with the old key, and, when needed, delivers the new keys, then, after that package is available, the new key can be used for signing.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. NuGet package files are simple XML files, and the merge procedure should be reasonably simple too.

    Packages are keyed by ID, so if there's a collision based on the ID, take the package reference with the highest version number.

    If the two sources include unique packages, the result should be the union of the two.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Maybe many will is interesting to compare files in your application. Is it possible to create a new product in the form of control for the .Net applications?

    I apologize if this is a silly suggestion, but the market I have not seen something like that.
    Thank you.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Show how smart you are by support Perl. It is said that only Perl can understand Perl...

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Currently, during a 3-way merge, the shown differences are always between Remote/Base and Local/Base.

    It would be great to have the possibility of also showing the differences between Remote/Local.

    Why? Sometimes the Remote and Local files are exactly the same and since the differences are marked on them when compared to Base they seem to be very different to each other. We have then to open or copy/paste both Remote and Local files on a file editor and then compare them, to see that they are exactly the same.

    This is quite common, because when we use squash in Git…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. Currently, during a 3-way merge, the individual differences are marked only on the Remote, Base and Local files.

    On the Result file, it is only shown the main change (line deleted or added), the individual changes are not shown. For example, if you rename a word in one line, on the 3 source files you have that work highlighted, however, on the result file, it's not highlighted, which makes it hard to see what the difference was.

    This would be very useful when solving merge conflicts, because then we could see the differences clearly with the changes on top of…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Rust is a young but promising language. Having semantic merge would be awesome.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Semantic Merge allows for external parsers but currently it only allows for one, making the adoption of using them very limited, when you are using more than one non-supported language. I would like it if Semantic Merge could support configuring external parsers by extensions they handle.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?