Settings and activity
191 results found
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Hi David,
Interesting. Why don't you do the same from the Branch Explorer? Just curious.
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment You want to check it out to lock it, correct?
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Ok, makes sense, thanks.
Why do you find this report useful?? (We don't use it very often, so we're curious to know more about the use case).
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Got it. Not hard to do.
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment What do you mean by "marked"?
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Hi!
Could you share how the desired input would be so we can have a better understanding? (And save time implementing :P)
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Hi Niklas,
Looks like an interesting one. We designed Gluon for maximum simplicity, so we purposely kept branches out. But... yes, what you describe is exactly that: branches. They could be somehow hidden for the user but...
Tell us more about why you find it useful. I mean, why they feel like checkin if they don't want to send it to the cloud?
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Hi Brian,
It is like you can read our mind :)
We have been looking into the Language Server Protocol (LPS) for a few weeks now, and we already plan to integrate it into Semantic Merge. Related to this, we are integrating Semantic Merge into Plastic, and this change will be released very soon. Integration of the LSP into Semantic Merge will follow at some future date.
On paper, the LSP is a neat idea. Write a Language Server (LS) once, give capabilities for said languages to multiple editors at the same time. However, we encountered obstacles in every Language Server we looked into.
Because the same team that implements the LS usually also implements the IDE / editor extension, they feel free to either break the protocol whenever is convenient, or have the server to behave in undocumented / unexpected ways.
This means that for every LS implementation out there we must write a custom wrapper to deal with these quirks. However, once that is completed, it will be easy to translate the LSP format into something Semantic is able to understand and expand the set of languages supported by Semantic Merge.
So, hopefully, Plastic (and gmaster!) will extend their semantic capabilities really soon thanks to the LSP. Differences, merging, and even difference editing with real time semantic outline...
As you can understand, this is something that will require some effort and lots of testing, so while it is definitely in our roadmap, right now we are prioritizing other projects that will for sure improve your experience as well.
In any case, thank you for your kind suggestion. We'll keep you posted on this!Sergio/Gwyn
-
108 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Yes, you are SOOOOOOOOOOO right.
No excuses.
We are swamped with a few other topics, but definitely this one is a must.
Sorry to make you wait.
pablo
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Hi Niklas,
You mean the "sync view", correct? You said the "merge view" and I can't understand the situation then.
Thanks,
pablo
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sure, good idea. Not that people use locking that much on the developer gui... but... no excuse.
pablo
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ok, thanks for the remark. It is definitely helpful.
-
42 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Probably you want to unify votes here
https://plasticscm.uservoice.com/forums/15467-general/suggestions/14721126-partial-file-checkin
An error occurred while saving the comment Just adding a link to https://plasticscm.uservoice.com/forums/15467-general/suggestions/16755301-allow-manual-selection-of-which-hunks-of-each-file which is a duplicate of this.
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Reviewing
An error occurred while saving the comment Hey guys,
Sure, not hard to do and makes lot of sense.
We'll keep an eye on it, but please ping us if we don't respond in a reasonable time.
pablo
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment I'm going to double check this. Please do not submit as anonymous :'(
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment I can only say... you are right.
We are not taking care of advanced users.
I know I'm asking you to do our job but, would you mind sharing a full list of things you miss?
pablo
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Yep, good point. We'll do it.
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Interesting. You could "easily" do that with a trigger. Would that be good for you? We can write one for you :)
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Thanks Mikko,
How would you imagine that?? Per view? Some global screen with all shortcuts together??
So, you'd like branch deletion to be easier to achieve, correct? I guess we should ask twice (or thrice) just to avoid someone deleting what they shouldn't :-)